Nebraska 2008 democratic caucus went 100% Barack Obama, should we be surprised?

I found this interesting internet discussion featuring Nebraska voters and their caucus delegates here. It is important to note that Hillary Clinton made HUGE STRIDES from the caucus result in Nebraska to the Nebraska primary vote that was held later on.

The Clinton voters could not believe that all of the Nebraska delegates voted to align with Barack Obama even before the primary vote and some delegates aligned with Barack Obama even before the caucus vote held in early February, 2008.

If Illinois had not moved its primary date by SEVEN WEEKS from the end of March, 2008 to the beginning of February, 2008, the close to a dozen caucuses held shortly after the Illinois vote (which gave Obama a huge delegate push) would have not been able to use the excuse that Barack Obama was leading to vote for him. Factor in that Michigan was not counted at all, and Barack Obama definitely would have been trailing going into the caucus contests.

It is my opinion that Barack Obama's side funneled promises or money to the Great Plains Indians tribes in various states in exchange for their caucus votes. While some may view this as a shrewd move, it may not have been an ethical one as Politicians cannot directly promise government funds in exchange for their votes. Barack Obama has doled out huge lawsuit based awards to both Indian Tribes and African American farmers.

To Barack Obama's credit, he did visit Nebraska once whereas Hillary Clinton did not.

Young Turks Analysis of the 2008 democratic race IGNORED Caucus and Primary Irregularities that favored Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton.

As the list below of Barack Obama 2008 primary and caucus victories below shows, Barack Obama's top 11 biggest percentage wins were all caucus contests, and none from primary states. Polling that was done just before virtually all of the 2008 democratic caucus contests showed Hillary Clinton either leading or tied with Barack Obama in those contests. For Hillary Clinton to then lose the caucus delegates by a 2-1 margin suggests some level of fraud or vote misrepresentation.

CLICK HERE TO ENLARGE IMAGE

The Young Turks youtube video "Why is Obama Winning So Many States" claims Barack Obama's 2008 early February delegate lead resulted from Barack Obama spending campaign money in all fifty states.

What the Young Turks fail to mention is that Illinois MOVED UP their primary date from the end of March 2008 to the beginning of February, 2008! The 54 delegate Illinois margin of victory for Barack Obama ended up being the difference maker as it helped Barack Obama to an unanticipated early delegate lead. This one action alone also helped motivate Barack Obama's field troops in the caucus contests that immediately followed, and to also raise money.

The Young Turks made no mention of Barack Obama suspending the Michigan vote. The hypocrisy of Barack Obama suspending one state that was economically desperate (Michigan) and wanted to be counted in the 2008 democratic race by moving their primary date up, while welcoming his own state (Illinois) moving up their own primary vote by 7 weeks is hypocrisy at best, political back room dealing at worst, and the very type of "change" Barack Obama claimed to oppose. lol, and Michael Moore (who is from Michigan) said NOTHING about this!

The states that moved up their dates that supported Hillary Clinton, Michigan and Florida, had their delegate votes suspended and diluted. Two states that supported Barack Obama included Illinois which did move up their date by seven weeks, and North Carolina, which wanted to move up their primary date but instead received BONUS DELEGATES of either 14 or 28 FOR NOT moving up their primary date.

So in these four instances among primary states, Hillary Clinton leaning states were sanctioned for moving up their primary dates, Barack Obama states WERE REWARDED.

As far as I know, none of the "in the tank for Barack Obama" media reported on either Illinois moving up their date, or North Carolina (a Barack Obama state) getting the bonus delegates, and that made Hillary Clinton fighting for Michigan and Florida look less reasonable than it actually was.

Fox and Friends to cover the Documentary "We Will Not Be Silenced" Sunday, August 1, 8am, 2010.

Fox is doing what a third news channel should be doing, messaging the Hillary Clinton voters from 2008. In the meantime, in less than one hour, Fox and Friends will be talking about the documentary "We Will Not Be Silenced", which covers the caucus cheating from the 2008 democratic race that overwhelmingly favored Barack Obama. You can learn more at Hillbuzz or you can see a preview of the documentary here.

I am curious why Fox is desperate to have Hillary Clinton run again in 2012. Is it because they think she could be defeated by a republican candidate more easily than Barack Obama, or because they genuinely think her policies would be better for the country overall than Barack Obama's.

Either way, the need for a third channel that covers the demographics that Hillary Clinton represents is DESPERATELY NEEDED. Learn more about Caucus Cheating here.

THE TRUE CHARACTER OF HILLARY CLINTON, from Joe Scarbororough and the Huffington Post.

Wow, oh Wow oh Wow. It's like being in the twilight zone and two years year later people slowly start admitting how the fix was in against Hillary Clinton in 2008. Click here to read this amazing editorial by Joe Scarborough that has been posted on the Huffington Post.

Or, you can read about Greg Crawford's decision to Leave MSNBC because of the 2008 treatment of Hillary Clinton by MSNBC.

You can also check out the 2008 Jack Ass Awards featuring virtually all of the democratic higher ups.

From a liberal, conservative hating retired blogger, a warning that Barack Obama will rue the day he kicked the Hillary Clinton voters to the curb. From the same retired blogger, an accounting of just some of the Hillary Hating comments found on Daily Kos.

50+ reasons to not vote for a democrat party that doesn't defend Hillary and Females from Sexist comments from the Media.

THE CLOVERFIELD CAUCUS IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON.

More proof of the Ridiculousness of Caucuses can be found by clicking here. In the state of Washington, Hillary Clinton lost the Washington caucus by more than a stunning 2-1 margin. And yet, 10 days later there would be a mail in primary vote and in that 2008 Washington Primary contest, Hillary Clinton gained so much ground it had to raise eyebrows.

Hillary Clinton only lost the 2008 unofficial Washington primary vote by a 51-46 margin after losing the Washington Caucus by an astounding 35 points!

The dramatic gain in primary vote totals by Hillary Clinton happened IN ALL FOUR 2008 DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS CONTESTS that also held primaries.

The Barack Obama Caucus Recruitment Flyers and the promise to not do what is on the Recruitment Flyers.

Did you know all the campaigns promised to not bring in Caucus volunteers from outside of Iowa? You can see the letter where all the different campaigns agree to not bring in outsiders by clicking here.

You can also view the "democratic underground topic", a completely pro Barack Obama forum that back then still had a tiny modicum of debate among its members.

CLICK ON IMAGES TO ENLARGE
CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE
CLICK ON IMAGES TO ENLARGE

CLICK ON IMAGES TO ENLARGE

Apparently, you can vote in the caucuses as long as you attend a college in that same state. The weird thing is, I believe you can also vote in your own home state as well. Two votes per person? Sure, as long as you are a student, you get to vote twice.

And if you're older, or work nights, don't like to go out at night, have to watch your kids, you know, the typical Hillary Clinton Voter, you can stay home, apparently the democratic party does not care about your vote.

Amazing quote from The Burning Platform, "Everyone knows Obama bussed in thousands from out of Iowa to win that, that's old news."

"Everyone knows Obama bussed in thousands from out of Iowa to win that, that's old news." - Mike in AZ.

Gosh, I didn't know it was old news.

Link to the quote by Mike in AZ. To find the quote you'll need to click on the replies to my first response in the thread, (Alessandro Machi) The rest of quote is pretty inane, just another male boldly bashing a female politician to feel better about their own masculinity. But it is interesting how this person, who is not a Hillary Clinton fan, still believes Barack Obama cheated in the Iowa Caucuses.

Did Barack Obama supporters cross over from Illinois into Iowa during the 2008 democratic primary?

Click here to see map at original link.

Click on Image to Enlarge.

Click here to go to original map link.

Click here to go to original story.

The Map above shows the Blue districts that were Barack Obama's 2008 Iowa Caucus victories. The heaviest concentration of Iowa district victories border Illinois and Wisconsin. I am not implying Barack Obama did not have support, he obviously did. But the right side of the map, right next to Illinois, is basically all Barack Obama.

The math is interesting. It would literally take only 6 or 7 caucus district reversals to give Hillary Clinton an Iowa win and Barack Obama a loss. Clearly, Illinois could have easily influenced 10 to 12 caucus districts.

The combination of Barack Obama and John Edwards combining forces, Illinois on the border, Barack Obama's verbal bashing of Hillary Clinton for remaining on the ballot in Michigan as being a threat to Iowa and New Hampshire always being the first two presidential contests, and it really makes Hillary Clinton's very close third place finish all the more remarkable, and Barack Obama's Iowa victory less so.

However, at the time of the victory, all that was reported was that Barack Obama had won and that if Hillary Clinton lost in New Hampshire she should give up. Thanks media, thanks for doing a bang up job of reporting the excitement you felt over the favored, experienced candidate losing so early on without any additional vetting of the situation.

Caucuses use 88% less voters than primaries to select each delegate, making any cross over votes from Illinois into Iowa of having the power of 10 votes. Iowa is known for taking very seriously their role in the presidential election process since they go first, so would it have been possible to "infiltrate" the Iowa voting process from Illinois? That I do not know, its just that the heavily concentrated victories along the Illinois border sure makes one wonder.